Tuesday, May 15, 2018

Top Eight Books I Didn't Necessarily Enjoy but Am Glad I Read

Top Ten Tuesday is a weekly meme hosted by That Artsy Reader Girl.

I'm going to sort these and there's probably not going to be ten... because I tend not to read that many books that I out-and-out hate. It's also going to be a little more wordy that I usually make my Top Ten Tuesdays because... I feel like I need to provide SOME explanation as to why.




The Throne of Glass series by Sarah J. Maas


I had a roommate once who ate bran muffins for breakfast every morning, despite the fact that she hated bran muffins, because she felt that that was what adults ate for breakfast ("interesting," I said, as I broke my fast with leftover pizza or goldfish crackers). But I get it now, because I kind of think Throne of Glass might be my very own bran muffins. I'm invested in maybe 4 characters and none of them get much in terms of screen time but I keep reading these books despite not really enjoying most of my reading experience. 

I found the first book... mediocre, I guess. It was fine but it was nothing to write home about. As I continued on with the series, mostly because it was one of those hyped series that made me wonder what I was missing and, surely, this book, I would see what everyone loved about this series. Instead I just found that it was more and more defined by tropes that I really didn't like. It's a fantasy story that doesn't do any of the things I like my fantasy stories to do with some stuff that just makes me cringe. 





I remember how angry reading this one made me, and I think it was mostly that I was, at this point, becoming aware of how often consent- not just the nuances thereof but just, basic consent was ignored in some YA books. I wound up writing a blog post about it because it made me (and still makes me) incredibly uncomfortable, when reading a book where a primary target audience is young women, to have a female character say "no" and to have that be ignored- and for the ignoring of  her refusal of intimacy somehow be portrayed as romantic. I don't even think this book was the worst offender, I've definitely read worse since (and thank goodness, so much better) but this was one of the first times, I think that it really hit me that. Wow. This was a trope I hated.




The Glittering Court (The Glittering Court, #1)
The Glittering Court by Richelle Mead


Mostly this one just allowed me to put the final nail the the Richelle Mead coffin. I've read multiple books from her now and I can confidently say that her work just isn't for me. The way she crafts characters just doesn't work for me. I like angst and dramatic self-pity as much as the next person but this pushes it, even for me. 






I PROMISE I'll be done with the S. J. Maas commentary after this. For this post at least. (If only because there aren't any other series out by her). One day I might make a longer post discussing my kind of difficult relationship with her books but... not this one.

*breathes in* *breathes out* Reading this book (and also the sequel and also kind of browsed book 3 before finally just giving up). Part of it is that romance-heavy books aren't really my thing. I mostly found myself going "wait was that supposed to be sexy? That was just... uncomfortable and borderline creepy" and it turns out that's just off-putting.

Outside of that I felt that this series didn't do a great job of carrying it's story or building it's world without resorting to dumping information on the reader.

After reading this and Throne of Glass I feel like I'm pretty attuned to a few tropes that I don't like. I find mating-bond stuff cringe-y at best, and that features heavily, so now I know I'll be steering clear of media that falls back on that particular trope...




Jane Eyre
Jane Eyre by Charlotte Brontë

Okay so to say I've "read" this is kind of an exaggeration... I'll admit I've yet to finish it.  I sit upon a throne of lies, etc. etc. 

I did get most of the way though the audiobook before deciding I'd rather read the book and then just... didn't pick up the book. I don't read a lot of classics for the simple reason of: I've found I don't enjoy a lot of classics. 

I'm glad I picked this one up mostly because now I get to make a million jokes at Mr. Rochester's expense regarding things like "never being fully convinced your new governance isn't a fairy" and "not liking a child because she's not a great conversationalist" oh and also "lying to your new governance/girlfriend about the wife whom you keep locked in the attic except for those times when she gets out and sets fires" honestly it's a pretty wild story and I like to make jokes. Rochester, you're lucky Jane is into people think she's a possibly-malevolent magical creature, insult her, lie to her, and now have no house because the aforementioned attic wife finally managed to burn it down. Romance.  








This one's stretching the prompt almost to breaking. I think this is a really excellent book but it is also one of the saddest books I've ever read. Reading it was both a meaningful experience and once that I don't think I'll ever repeat. The Seven Husbands of Evelyn Hugo is nuanced and thought-provoking and has definitely stuck with me (more even than I was expecting when I wrote the review) but it was also somewhat staggering in how melancholy aspects of it were. I'm glad I read it, essentially, but I wouldn't do it again (and I say that as a chronic re-reader). I think I'm a bit clearer on why in my review, which you can find here, if you want clarification.



The Kite Runner
The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini

Okay so I'm actually still not really glad I read this, except that when someone says "wow you sure do have a lot of anger about high school English, what did it ever do to you?" I can just point to this book. 

I'm still not really sure if this was a good or a bad book overall (I personally didn't find the characters, story, or prose that compelling) but it's more that... look. It was just a book with subject matter that I think I would find difficult to handle now, reading more only my own mental enrichment, much less with my grade on the line as a 16 year-old. So yeah. Still not totally over that.

So I guess what I'm saying is that being made to read this book really drove home an idea? Something about what kind of literature many people teaching English think teens should read and the wide, wide chasm between that and what I personally enjoy and/or find meaningful in a story.






One Hundred Years of Solitude by Gabriel García Márquez

I'm glad I read this one and I think I might like to give it another try with the perspective I have now, but I didn't particularly enjoy it when I read it in high school. Mostly, I think, because I wasn't familiar with the cultural context in which it was written (which I'm more aware of now), which is fairly essential to grasping the nuances of this story (or being able to make sense of most of it in any form at all). To high-school me it seemed like vaguely symbolic surrealist confusion but my understanding of the history of Latin America as a place and magical realism as a genre has improved quite a bit since then and I think I'd be able to get more out of the reading experience.

18 comments :

  1. I have the TOG books on my shelf, but the more I read about them, them less I think I actually want to read this series. Plus, with each new book, they keep getting longer - and I'm so not a fan of lengthy books! ;)

    Thanks so much for visiting Finding Wonderland, Kelly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, if you're not a huge fan of giant tomes this might not be the series for you. I think I probably will finish the series, mostly because there are a few characters whose story arcs I'm invested in. I've come to suspect that it isn't that Sarah J. Maas cant' write characters I'm invested in... more that the characters MAAS feels invested in are not the ones I'm invested in, and what feels like a satisfying character arc differs from me to Maas?

      Anyway. I think I'm sort of glad that I read the series because people liked it SO MUCH it made me make a conscious effort to define why it wasn't working for me.

      Thanks for dropping by!

      Delete
  2. I also really disliked ACOTAR but the second book in the series was pehnomenal so it was worth readng.

    My TTT: https://fantasyraiders.wordpress.com/2018/05/15/top-ten-tuesday-books-i-didliked-but-glad-i-read/#more-8338

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've known a couple people who followed this pattern, and, while I do think the second book was in some ways an improvement on the first, the things that were improved weren't the core of why this book didn't work for me. If that makes sense? I'm glad you found persevering through the first book was rewarding for you, though! It's always nice when giving a story a second chance pays off.

      Delete
  3. I agree about the mating-bond thing in ACOTAR. It was weird. The characters also talked about it ALLLLLLLL the time toward the ending of the 2nd book and into the 3rd book. I was starting to get so annoyed I almost wanted to chuck my book at the wall. I really loved the 2nd one though. I thought was a decent story. :)

    -Amber

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think the general consensus (although I could be wrong) among fans is that ACOMAF is the strongest in the trilogy. (Or is it a series now? I've heard there's a 4th book but I'm not sure... is it a spinoff or a continuation?)

      The mating-bond trope is... just something that really doesn't work for me for a lot of reasons. (Maas actually does touch on a couple of those reasons in the story but doesn't engage with them much and they wind up brushed under the rug by book 3.) Overall by the middle of the third book I was so thoroughly done with hearing about it that I just... mostly browsed the second half of the book, honestly.

      Delete
  4. Fascinating list. Evelyn Hugo is on my to read list. I'll keep your comments in mind.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's a really good read! I think part of it was it hit some specific narrative notes for me that made it both good and also sad? It was a weird feeling, and I sometimes just catch myself thinking about the story. I'd love to hear your thoughts if you get around to picking it up

      Delete
  5. I felt the same way about Throne of Glass, but never continued after the second book. I also hated The Glittering Court.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I feel like if ToG doesn't work for you, the rest of the series probably won't either? I could be wrong but I don't think I've met anyone who found that the things they disliked in the first book went away in the sequels. (I definitely didn't).

      Delete
  6. One Hundred Years of Solitude is my personal nemesis book. I have tried to read it probably 5 times (maybe more). I've almost finished it that many times. One day I will finish it just so I can say I did!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was a bit of a struggle for me to get through.If you do decide to give it another try you could try first giving the Crash Course video duology for the book a watch! I found it helpful for context and interpretation when I watched it quite a while after finishing. You can find it here.

      Delete
  7. I do love the Throne of Glass series, but I can definitely see why it's not for everyone. And I much preferred the second ACOTAR book to the first one. I like your bran muffin analogy-I don't think I have any books that are my personal bran muffins, but maybe I do? I hadn't heard about the thing you talked about for The Sin Eater's Daughter, so thanks for the heads up!
    My TTT: https://jjbookblog.wordpress.com/2018/05/15/top-ten-tuesday-159/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm glad you like the analogy!

      The Sin Eater's Daughter thing was... a thing? I haven't really encountered anyone else who had an issue with the specific things that bothered me but I also haven't really encountered that many people who've read it. I think it might have been a case of the straw breaking the camel's back for me too...

      Delete
  8. I loved The Kite Runner...and have also tried several times to get caught up in Jane Eyre :(
    I do have The Seven Husbands on my TBR though...gonna think about that one some more.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Suggestion: if Jane Eyre is not working for you, why not try reading Sarah Rees Brennan's Gothic Tuesday summary about it? It hits all the weird, weird high notes, and is REALLY funny to boot.

      The Seven Husbands of Evelyn Hugo IS a good book. It's just also a book that's sad in a kind of obscure way? I'm not totally sure if that makes sense, I did try to articulate it more clearly in the review.

      Delete
  9. I never continued ACOTAR,but the whole mate concept is very cringe-y. I just have issues with her fae male characters in general. You know that Chrissy Teigen meme where she's grimacing? That's me whenever I come across people talking about it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh boy yep, I didn't even get into how uncomfortable with the toxic masculinity oozing from some of the tropes appearing in the characters. It was kind of uncomfortable to read at times...

      Delete